News
 
LTmensclinic1

Testosterone Pellets are a convenient treatment option
for busy people

What is Pellet therapy? Pellets are approved for testosterone replacement therapy in adult males for conditions associated with low or absent testosterone in the body. Testosterone pellets are implanted under the skin and consistently release small, physiologic doses of testosterone into the blood stream.  Once in place, the pellets deliver a steady dose of testosterone, keeping you in your normal testosterone range for 3-6 months. The pellets are very small (about the size of a grain of rice) and are inserted in a simple and painless 5-10 minute procedure in the office.

Can I maintain my activities? Pellet therapy is designed for patients with a busy lifestyle. With pellet therapy, men can return to normal activities soon after the procedure. Blood tests are used to help adjust the pellet dosage so that you get the correct amount of hormones every time.

Are Pellets Bioidentical Hormones? Yes, pellets are bioidentical hormones.  Bioidentical hormone preparations are medications that contain hormones that are an exact chemical match to those made naturally by humans.

Will Insurance pay for Pellets? The pellets are covered by most insurance plans, making it a convenient and cost effective alternative to your current therapy. A quick call to our office at 817-416-5698 could help you to determine if your specific insurance company will help to cover the cost

Benefits of Testosterone Replacement Therapy

Benefits of Testosterone Replacement Therapy at Low Testosterone Men’s Clinic vary based upon the pre-therapy symptoms and other factors, but can include:

  • Increased male sex drive
  • Improved erectile function
  • Decreased moodiness/depression
  • Reduced risk of heart disease
  • Improved concentration and focus
  • Improved motivation
  • Increased energy and vitality
  • Increased strength and endurance
  • Reduced body fat
  • Ability to develop lean muscle mass with exercise
  • Increase body hair growth
  • Increase male bone density
LTmensclinic1

Latest Testosterone Study Finds No Heart Attack Risk

In the latest addition to the ongoing debate over the safety of testosterone treatment, researchers report no significant increased heart-attack risk in older men treated with an intramuscular form of the therapy.

The study, published online this week in the Annals of Pharmacotherapy, compared 6355 Medicare beneficiaries treated with testosterone with 19,065 who were not, between January 1997 and December 2005, and showed no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 – 1.02).

"In this matched double-cohort study of more than 24,000 Medicare beneficiaries, we found that use of intramuscular testosterone therapy was not associated with an increased risk of MI," say the authors.

Furthermore, "a dose–response analysis demonstrated no increased risk in MI according to estimated cumulative dose of testosterone. These findings were robust across a range of sensitivity analyses that addressed eligibility criteria, exposure thresholds, follow-up periods, and covariate adjustment," they add.

In fact, testosterone was associated with a possible protective effect — a reduced risk of heart attack in patients with the highest prognostic risk index for MI (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 – 0.92), and there were no differences in risk in patients in the lower quartiles of MI prognostic score.

First author Jacques Baillargeon, PhD, of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, noted that various potential mechanisms could explain the protective effect. "Certainly there is some literature showing plausible biologic mechanisms where testosterone could in theory confer a protective effect, such as by decreasing fat mass, increasing lean body mass, and decreasing insulin sensitivity and the lipid profile," he told Medscape Medical News.

"Testosterone may also possess anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant properties, but likewise, there are also plausible pathways whereby it could increase cardiovascular risk, so there are arguments to be made both ways," he said.

No Increased MI Risk With Intramuscular Testosterone "Reassuring"

Patients in the study were over aged 65, and testosterone-treated patients were matched 1:3 with nontreated patients according to their composite MI prognostic index score.

Reasons for initiation of testosterone therapy included hypogonadism, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, and osteoporosis.

The men were followed until December 2005 or they lost their Medicare coverage, experienced an MI, or died. Those receiving testosterone therapy had an average follow-up of 1495 days; the average follow-up for those not receiving therapy was 1193 days.

Because the treatments were all given before 2005, testosterone was administered in the form of intramuscular injections. Patients receiving the therapy had an average of 8.2 injections over the study period, including 4.4 injections in the first year, and were more likely to have a high degree of comorbid disease compared with nonusers.

http://www.ltmensclinic.com/latest-testost…rt-attack-risk

LTmensclinic1

 

Latest Testosterone Study Finds No Heart Attack Risk                                                      Additional information - 817-416-5698

 

In the latest addition to the ongoing debate over the safety of testosterone treatment, researchers report no significant increased heart-attack risk in older men treated with an intramuscular form of the therapy.

The study, published online this week in the Annals of Pharmacotherapy, compared 6355 Medicare beneficiaries treated with testosterone with 19,065 who were not, between January 1997 and December 2005, and showed no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 – 1.02).

"In this matched double-cohort study of more than 24,000 Medicare beneficiaries, we found that use of intramuscular testosterone therapy was not associated with an increased risk of MI," say the authors.

Furthermore, "a dose–response analysis demonstrated no increased risk in MI according to estimated cumulative dose of testosterone. These findings were robust across a range of sensitivity analyses that addressed eligibility criteria, exposure thresholds, follow-up periods, and covariate adjustment," they add.

In fact, testosterone was associated with a possible protective effect — a reduced risk of heart attack in patients with the highest prognostic risk index for MI (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 – 0.92), and there were no differences in risk in patients in the lower quartiles of MI prognostic score.

First author Jacques Baillargeon, PhD, of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, noted that various potential mechanisms could explain the protective effect. "Certainly there is some literature showing plausible biologic mechanisms where testosterone could in theory confer a protective effect, such as by decreasing fat mass, increasing lean body mass, and decreasing insulin sensitivity and the lipid profile," he told Medscape Medical News.

"Testosterone may also possess anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant properties, but likewise, there are also plausible pathways whereby it could increase cardiovascular risk, so there are arguments to be made both ways," he said.

No Increased MI Risk With Intramuscular Testosterone "Reassuring"

Patients in the study were over aged 65, and testosterone-treated patients were matched 1:3 with nontreated patients according to their composite MI prognostic index score.

Reasons for initiation of testosterone therapy included hypogonadism, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, and osteoporosis.

The men were followed until December 2005 or they lost their Medicare coverage, experienced an MI, or died. Those receiving testosterone therapy had an average follow-up of 1495 days; the average follow-up for those not receiving therapy was 1193 days.

Because the treatments were all given before 2005, testosterone was administered in the form of intramuscular injections. Patients receiving the therapy had an average of 8.2 injections over the study period, including 4.4 injections in the first year, and were more likely to have a high degree of comorbid disease compared with nonusers.

http://www.ltmensclinic.com/latest-testost…rt-attack-risk